bootcapacity.com > Versus > Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI vs Nissan Micra 1.2

Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI (2016) Vs. Nissan Micra 1.2 (2016)

Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Nissan Micra 1.2 Street
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Comparison 2016 Nissan Micra Street Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2016
Equipment Comfortline Street
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback

Engine Specs

Engine 1.2 TSI 1.2
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1197 cc 1198 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type DSG CVT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 7 ?
Driving System Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 90 HP 80 HP
Torque 160 Nm 110 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.8 sn 13.7 sn
Maximum Speed 184 170

Fuel Consumption

City 6.0 L 6.1 L
Highway 4.0 L 4.3 L
Combined 5.0 L 5.2 L
Fuel Tank 45 L 41 L

Dimensions

Length 3972 mm 3825 mm
Width 1682 mm 1665 mm
Height 1453 mm 1510 mm
Curb Weight 1107 kg 945 kg
Boot Space 280 L 265 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 185 165
Tire Sidewall 60 70
Wheel Rims Size 15 14
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline 2016 Nissan Micra 1.2 Street

Which one is better?

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Technical Specifications

2016 Nissan Micra 1.2 Street Technical Specifications

Volkswagen Polo vs Nissan Micra Comparison

When deciding between 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline and 2016 Nissan Micra 1.2 Street, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 280 L vs 265 L
  • Engine Power: 90 HP vs 80 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.0 L vs 5.2 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Volkswagen Polo offers 280 liters, while the Nissan Micra stands out with 80 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands