bootcapacity.com > Versus > Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI vs Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Comfortline vs Trendline

Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Comfortline Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Trendline
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Comfortline Comparison 2016 Volkswagen Polo Trendline Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2016
Equipment Comfortline Trendline
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback

Engine Specs

Engine 1.4 TDI 1.4 TDI
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1422 cc 1422 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual Manual
Gearbox Manual Manual
Number of gears 5 5
Driving System Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 90 HP 90 HP
Torque 230 Nm 210 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.9 sn 10.9 sn
Maximum Speed 184 184

Fuel Consumption

City 4.3 L 4.4 L
Highway 3.5 L 3.2 L
Combined 3.9 L 3.8 L
Fuel Tank 45 L 45 L

Dimensions

Length 3972 mm 3972 mm
Width 1682 mm 1682 mm
Height 1453 mm 1453 mm
Curb Weight 1151 kg 1152 kg
Boot Space 280 L 280 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 185 185
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 15 15
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Comfortline 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Trendline

Which one is better?

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Comfortline Technical Specifications

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Trendline Technical Specifications

Volkswagen Polo vs Volkswagen Polo Comparison

When deciding between 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Comfortline and 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI Trendline, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 280 L vs 280 L
  • Engine Power: 90 HP vs 90 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 3.9 L vs 3.8 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Volkswagen Polo offers 280 liters, while the Volkswagen Polo stands out with 90 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands